Talk:Farrow & Ball
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Farrow & Ball article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertising tone
[edit]Please be careful to be encyclopedic in language. Recent edits sound like advertising, with use of phrases like "for the discerning".CApitol3 12:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Mummy parts
[edit]The article doesn't suggest they are used in contemporary paint formulas. Use of dried mummy parts appears in Farrow & Ball literature as the article states, as a curious ingredient in antique paint recipes. Use of dried mummy parts appears in several books on color and paint. Are you suggesting th eFarrow & Ball literiature is in error? How would you know that? I believe your concern is subjective. Would you share why this is troubling to you? Thanks. 12:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Website link in the article
[edit]Shouldn't the link in the article ( http://us.farrow-ball.com/colours/paint/fcp-category/list?resetFilters=true ) link to the UK website? ...It's a English company after all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.230.117 (talk) 16:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)