Talk:Federation of Student Islamic Societies

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Do you really think it's necessary to include the hindu forum claims? FOSIS has commented on many issues in the news (see press releases) and singling this one out is misrepresentative - especially as it could hardly be deemed to be a controversy.Mo azim ahmed 19:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a significant controversy, and it's not commenting about just anything, it's commenting about accusations against them, which makes it relevant to the article. I'm sure this article will benefit from more information on FOSIS. Misheu 20:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize - I have only now read the attached links. I have misunderstood the story and thought that FOSIS was the one being accused. I see that is not the case at all. I changed it a bit according to the press releases. It can be dropped all together, but I think it's important to leave their comments on various issues. Misheu 05:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think it would be more appropriate to not mention it at all. A quick look at their press releases shows their comment on many news issues. http://www.fosis.org.uk/media/archives.php I'll leave the decision to you though. Mo azim ahmed 03:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since Misheu agrees the news info is not completely related, I'll be removing it. I believe it is detrimental unless FOSIS' press releases on other issues are included, which would be a lot more work to add on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mo azim ahmed (talk • contribs) 15:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]