Talk:Fenit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Ireland (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Irish Maritime
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
 

Merge proposal[edit]

About then half of this article is devoted to Fenit Harbour and in turn that article has about half town data in it. In essence they are duplicate articles, so a merge seems the best way to give each it due; being a town article with a good harbour section. Duplicated articles are silly. ww2censor 15:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Support as per nom. (Sarah777 20:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC))
I agree with an article merge, but, in essence, the harbour is more important than the village. The village originated from the houses which were built to house the dock workers ~~MOC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fenitharbour (talkcontribs) 16:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you have a source for that statement? If so, please provide it so we can maybe merge to Fenit harbour instead of the opposite. Without a source we will merge to Fenit. Cheers ww2censor 23:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Fenit is first and foremost a place called FENIT. That should be the main title for the description and the harbour and port form part of the descriptionGlinner 18:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Fenit Harbour, Fenit Within, Fenit Without, Fenit Island, Fenit Marina, Fenit Village.... Three entries are justifies; Harbour, Island and Village. Allifferent entities in their own right. The harbour came first. A heavily historic area on Tralee Bay Michael O' Carroll (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

The problem with doing individual articles about each of these is that one ends up with a load of short stubs that have little real substance. A single article for all the Fenit's, which are all in the same area and interrelated, might actually become an inclusive article of quality and the other titles can be redirects to the main article. Have you considered that possibility? Possibly Fenit Harbour should be the main article. ww2censor (talk) 22:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

On reflection, I agree with one heading for Fenit, with sub sections for the village, the harbour, the marina, Fenit Island etc, etc. I do not have the skill to edit etc and woula appreciate another person taking on the job. 83.147.134.51 (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC) MOC - fenitharbour

Still agree - and I notice this proposal was made in October 2007! I could merge them but I'd need to be sure everyone was happy to go ahead. Ww2? Sarah777 (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 Done ww2censor (talk) 04:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Nice one Ww - this is definitely a new C - a grade I strongly supported 'cos FA folk like yerself and VK don't realise how important getting a C is to those of us scrabbling around in the stubs and starts! Sarah777 (talk) 06:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fenit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)