Talk:Ferguson Marine
Appearance
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shipyard facilities
[edit]The data in this section is unreferenced. "Yard working area of 10.498m2" doesn't look right - perhaps 10,498m2? Davidships (talk) 23:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
EngVar
[edit]British English is clearly appropriate for this British company article per MOS:TIES, and firmly supported by the exception in MOS:RETAIN. Davidships (talk) 01:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. Dormskirk (talk) 09:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Ferries Fiasco
[edit]Before adding a paragraph on this highly noteworthy - if not notable - topic, can any editor tell me if we have previously had scuh an article/section and it has been deleted? Friendly regards, Springnuts (talk) 22:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Stub-Class Scotland articles
- Low-importance Scotland articles
- Stub-Class Scotland Transport articles
- Low-importance Scotland Transport articles
- All WikiProject Scotland pages
- Stub-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles