Talk:FindArticles

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Bibliographies Low‑importance

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"...going as far back as 1998"

This article [1] was released in July, 1996, that was two years before then. --Lofor (talk) 17:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change status?

Now that findarticles.com redirects to search.com, should the status (or anything else in this article) be changed? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 04:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where exactly did the site go? I'm trying to fix a dead (or rather, mislead) reference link from said website and there's nary a trace of it. Can anyone figure out what the hell happened? Can't even begin to tell the level of frustration rising here. 71.229.23.9 (talk) 08:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably CBS saw that rubbish thing they've replaced it with as a better money maker.. or lesser money loser.. and ditched it. Pity, excellent site, though it did lose content towards the end. Would suggest that anybody coming across links to a similar site which seem 'too valuable to lose' use the WebCitation website to archive them.

Pity really, keeping that site open would be about the only worthwhile thing CBS has ever done. Nevard (talk) 20:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FindArticles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]