Talk:Firminus Caron

Composer project review

I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles. This article is B-class; it doesn't answer the question of why this guy might not have been a pseudonym for somebody else, given the dearth of documentation. (I suppose a simple answer is that the doc that exists does so in a relatively wide variety of places.) My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

No, the name is definitely not a pseudonym; added information makes that clear. (Some of which sent from David Fallows, but all having references in either his Grove article or the Wegman article). Thanks for taking the time to review. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 16:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the update! I need that book.  :) Antandrus (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Firminus Caron/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

==Composers Project Assessment of Firminus Caron: 2009-02-5== This is an assessment of article Firminus Caron by a member of the Composers project, according to its assessment criteria. This review was done by Magicpiano. If an article is well-cited, the reviewer is assuming that the article reflects reasonably current scholarship, and deficiencies in the historical record that are documented in a particular area will be appropriately scored. If insufficient inline citations are present, the reviewer will assume that deficiencies in that area may be cured, and that area may be scored down. Adherence to overall Wikipedia standards (WP:MOS, WP:WIAGA, WP:WIAFA) are the reviewer's opinion, and are not a substitute for the Wikipedia's processes for awarding Good Article or Featured Article status. ===Origins/family background/studies=== Does the article reflect what is known about the composer's background and childhood? If s/he received musical training as a child, who from, is the experience and nature of the early teachers' influences described? ok ===Early career=== Does the article indicate when s/he started composing, discuss early style, success/failure? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed? ok ===Mature career=== Does the article discuss his/her adult life and composition history? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed? ok ===List(s) of works=== Are lists of the composer's works in WP, linked from this article? If there are special catalogs (e.g. Köchel for Mozart, Hoboken for Haydn), are they used? If the composer has written more than 20-30 works, any exhaustive listing should be placed in a separate article. A full list could be given. ===Critical appreciation=== Does the article discuss his/her style, reception by critics and the public (both during his/her life, and over time)? ok ===Illustrations and sound clips=== Does the article contain images of its subject, birthplace, gravesite or other memorials, important residences, manuscript pages, museums, etc? Does it contain samples of the composer's work (as composer and/or performer, if appropriate)? (Note that since many 20th-century works are copyrighted, it may not be possible to acquire more than brief fair use samples of those works, but efforts should be made to do so.) If an article is of high enough quality, do its images and media comply with image use policy and non-free content policy? (Adherence to these is needed for Good Article or Featured Article consideration, and is apparently a common reason for nominations being quick-failed.) No sound or images (although I'm not sure what you would put an image of here -- hence the pass). ===References, sources and bibliography=== Does the article contain a suitable number of references? Does it contain sufficient inline citations? (For an article to pass Good Article nomination, every paragraph possibly excepting those in the lead, and every direct quotation, should have at least one footnote.) If appropriate, does it include Further Reading or Bibliography beyond the cited references? Article has references; no inline citations. ===Structure and compliance with WP:MOS=== Does the article comply with Wikipedia style and layout guidelines, especially WP:MOS, WP:LEAD, WP:LAYOUT, and possibly WP:SIZE? (Article length is not generally significant, although Featured Articles Candidates may be questioned for excessive length.) ok ===Things that may be necessary to pass a Good Article review=== Article requires more inline citations (WP:CITE) ===Summary=== Hmm, a virtually undocumented person; does he really exist? One question this sort of bio raises: why is it not possible this is a pseudonym for someone else? Article is otherwise fine, except for some usual issues: inline citations, works list. I give a pass on the image requirement, it seems daunting. Article is B-class. Magic♪piano 14:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 14:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 15:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)