Talk:First Battle of Tarain

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in India may be able to help!

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in India may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Biased Article

The article is biased in favor of Hindu views of history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.186.113.117 (talk) 10:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this is a very much biased version of history, i am not a ghori or a hindu but here facts are very much distorted. and article written in full favor of hindu version of history. (e.g in more than 2 places we see written "hence rendering persian history unreliable" which i personally never found anywhere else, persian and afghan histories were somehow more realistic than other versions even criticizing their own emperors ) and AT THE SAME TIME the author is again and again refering to "Prithviraj Raso", (i am speechless), PRITHVIRAJ RASO is an poem composed by court poet, Chand Bardai, on the life of Prithviraj III, even its name contains prithvraj, its author is his court poet, and even its not history but a poem to praise his emperor. on the other hand the author is simply rejecting the historic articles by persian afghan and indian authors. a very pathetic article. Wikipedia should have some standards and QA to stop people uploading wrong information on events and happenings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.109.48.48 (talk) 11:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Sources

Historians such as James todd and Ferishta should be avoided as both are biased. Books and other info from modern historians should be used more often. Divyraj (talk) 09:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ferishta is quoted and Chandra is explicit this figure is exaggerated and all of this is sourced within the article. Yet oddly you quote Ferishta[1], even plagiarizing Chandra to do it![2] I have restored the sentence by Ferishta you removed and removed your plagiarism. Please do not restore said plagiarism. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Split

These are two separate battles, fought in different years with different results: each should have its own article. utcursch | talk 03:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2021

FIRST BATTLE OF TARAIN GURUD STRENTH- 2 Lakh 20 thousand out of which 1 lakh 50 thousand cavalry 70 thousand infantry Chamana’s strength- 1 Lakh 10 Thousand 80 thousand 30 thousand infantry

Second battle of Tarain Chamana’s strength- 2 lakh 10 thousand out of which 1 lakh 30 thousand cavalry and 80 thousand infantry Gurid’s strength- 4 lakh out of which 1 lakh infantry and 3 lakh cavalry

These are the accounts that I had submitted Nishant lakhara (talk) 03:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]