Talk:Fit model

Editing of page[edit]

This article is relatively new and as something of a neologism, the phrase "fit model" page needs sources. Have reverted the recent edit of references (albeit not permalinks, my apologies) as WP:ED guidelines are not definitive; editing without prior discussion may be viewed as subjective. AntiVanity (talk) 09:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "fitting model" does seem to be the more established term. I've changed the article name accordingly. -- The Anome (talk) 04:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having been a "fit model" myself in the past I'd beg to differ. Indeed the changed title is without references to support the change whereas the usual term is easily referenced (and used to be). --AlisonW (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any citations for the term fitting model? I think we should change page name back. - phi (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...and my search for refs turned up so many I changed it back now. I guess the 'logism' is no longer so 'neo' and hope consensus approves. - phi (talk) 19:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very strange model[edit]

About that model mentioned at the end - where did they find a guy half as tall as the Eiffel Tower? Also I doubt someone that tall only weighs 180 Tons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.219.37.232 (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]