Talk:Flagship (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article reads like it was copied off of Flagship magazine's web site. There are no sources cited. It is unduly fawning and adulatory towards the magazine.70.55.58.171 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are numerous other articles in Wikipedia about magazines, some even in the same category as this article. Revisions to this article should follow their example. The topic is notable enough but it needs to be made into a Wikipedia article and not this thing.69.157.226.220 16:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite the magazine itself as a source? It seems like the best proof of when it started and who started it is issue 1 (which is pretty rare now). I think the citeation needed comments are incorrect on these things and I will remove them. I'll leave the complaints about neutrality/fanboy where they are for someone more experienced to remove. (82.11.249.189 16:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

After some pondering I removed two of the complaints, I think the page is neutral now.(82.11.249.189 16:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I have just added some information to the page. I put issue 130 together for Carol in 2010, generating PDFs for the printer. It is unclear if the magazine will be taken over by anyone else following her being taken ill. --Norsktrad (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a reference to the magazine website where many issues can be downloaded in pdf format User talk:zoltar0) 14 May 2022 — Preceding undated comment added 15:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 July 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flagship Magazine → Flagship (magazine) – Reasons:

http://www.flagshipmagazine.co.uk has back issues, and throughout it's always called Flagship. There are no examples of a proper noun title Flagship Magazine. Other than the domain name itself which I think serves as a disambiguator
The article was once called Flagship magazine with magazine lower case it operates as a disambiguation and those should be in parentheses per dab guidelines.

-- GreenC 04:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per nom. It seems clear that there isn't a basis for this factually incorrect WP:NATURALDAB. -- Netoholic @ 07:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I agree with the nominator. I also saw this issue a while back. It should be fixed. Airborne84 (talk) 10:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - makes sense to me, and it's what we usually do with magazines unless the word "Magazine" is specifically in the title. BOZ (talk) 11:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.