Talk:Fog robotics
Appearance
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Request edit
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Dear Editors, please have a look for proposed changes below for adding a project to the Research Section:
- Research subheading
Fog Robotics[1]
This project focuses on showing the importance and practical applicability of fog robotics particularly considering human-robot interaction scenarios. It utilises fog robot servers, cloud, and the robots for evaluation of fog robotics architecture and their advantages.[2][3]
Krish1804 (talk) 00:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Gudi, Chand. "Fog Robotics". Retrieved 29 January 2019.
- ^ Fog Robotics: An Introduction. Gudi, S.L.K.C., et al. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2017
- ^ Fog Robotics for Efficient, Fluent and Robust Human-Robot Interaction. Gudi, S.L.K.C., et al. IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) 2018
- I'm guessing this would be placed in the lead? It doesnt say where this would go.
"focuses on showing the importance and practicality of FR"
is somewhat of a tacit acknowledgement that the article's purpose would be the promotion of how FR is viewed by the public, namely, that the view become favorable towards FR. That, coupled with the challenging nature of the phrasing at the end of the proposed statement, leads me to ask if there is possibly another way which this could be worded, that would work better for readers wanting to learn more about FR? Perhaps a statement which gives a general description of FR could be written. That would be a more ideal lead statement to go with (if it were to be placed in the lead). Do any editors have ideas about this? - Regards, Spintendo 03:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Spintendo: Thank you for your response. This is intended to be a part of the Research section as it is one of the projects. Upon your suggestions, I edited the section. Please let me know if anything more is needed Krish1804 (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Reply 15-APR-2019
[edit]Edit request implemented Spintendo 07:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/13 April 2019
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Robotics articles
- Low-importance Robotics articles
- WikiProject Robotics articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Start-Class Disability articles
- WikiProject Disability articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors
- Implemented requested edits