Talk:Foliar feeding

“ The sunflower is eggs in the perimeter of the foliar fertilization of chickens.” makes exactly zero sense. Such sentences do not inspire confidence in the general veracity of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8004:12C1:E40E:110E:66B7:A130:4477 (talk) 01:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't they should be merged, per se, because foliar spraying includes pesticides, and any other kind of spraying one might do.

Foliar feeding is specifically the delivery of nutrients to a plant through foliage. --Kaz 20:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any sources that cite any proof of foliar fertilization or it's mode of action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.84.244.12 (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

have added references to publication of the original 1950s research and to contemporary papers on this subject. The section on kelp needs references...over to other editors on that.sinarau (talk) 02:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See https://ipm.missouri.edu/MPG/2019/4/foliarFeeding/ for a much better explanation of the consequences of foliar feeding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:F00:7C00:954F:4F51:E866:4A56 (talk) 14:00, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of statments in this article need to be backed up by references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.163.8.100 (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

possible bad science

It is known that tools and equipment in the 50's field experiment conducted are either not proper calibrated nor clean properly to prevent bad false positive. Many scientist cannot replicate experiment results. Today, foliar feeding enable a multi-billions business and no solid evidence show that foliar feeding works consistently. Tan S.L. (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which 1950s field experiment are you referring to, you provide no source? How did it become "known" and by whom, that there were material errors in this experiment? What "experiment results" are "many scientist" (sic) unable to replicate? You offer no solid evidence of "no solid evidence". Sources are required. Plantsurfer 18:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Foliar feeding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218091400/http://www.motherearthnews.com/article.aspx?id=113390 to http://www.motherearthnews.com/article.aspx?id=113390

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Plant Ecology Winter 2023

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2023 and 10 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Serosa19 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Serosa19 (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]