Talk:Fort King George
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
old talk
[edit]I will continue to work on this page, adding categories, etc. I think it is significant enough to keep around.
User: Havardj Jack 17:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for improving the page. Postcard Cathy 16:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
recent changes
[edit]Great work, but there are two things:
- It needs wikilinks
- I think it goes too far beyond the scope of the fort in the background section. Bubba73 (talk), 02:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Agree - it covers 200 years of Southeast settlement, rivalry among the European powers, the Spanish mission system, etc., for a fort that was used for only six years. This is not typical coverage of articles on forts and overwhelms content dealing with the fort. Needs to be more focused. Some of the material, written with great verve, should be applied to other articles on the Southeast. Parkwells (talk) 00:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- C-Class Georgia (U.S. state) articles
- Low-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles
- WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance