Talk:Fox Lake (Florida)

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Fox Lake (Florida) is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fox Lake (Florida). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726150646/http://www.highlandsswcd.org/Lakes%20information/Lakes%20of%20Highlands%20County.pdf to http://www.highlandsswcd.org/Lakes%20information/Lakes%20of%20Highlands%20County.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for keeping this page

This lake is a permanent geographical feature of the area in which it is located. Why are permanent features being nominated for deletion? Bill Pollard (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wpollard, just because this lake is a permanent geographical feature does not mean it meets WP:NRVE and other notability guidelines. And by the way you need to stop deleting these deletion proposals because you have a big history of getting proposed deletions for your most of your articles. Sometimes, you need to suck it up and accept the fact that your articles doesnt meet notability guidelines. Also, ‘’’don’t make up stories’’’ about not seeing the “Contest” button because I already tried viewing the article through multiple devices including my cell phone and there was always a contest button. If you continue to do these actions such as creating non notable articles and then defending yourself with these non sense stories about not seeing a contest button you should expect yourself to someday get reported and warned from this unfair behavior. (I deeply recommend that you read the criteria for any sort of deletions and also read the notability guidelines) Yanjipy (talk) 19:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I probably missed the contest button to this article. If I did I will apologize for that. However, to contest a speedy deletion it is necessary to remove the notice about a speedy deletion, so the article can go to the "Articles for Deletion" process and be examined by as many users as want to participate and judge the article. You talk about making up stories. Your claim that most of my articles get proposed for deletion is not base in fact. Very few of my articles have been proposed for deletion and still fewer have been deleted. I do not make stories and I see no reason why I should be reported for unfair behavior. I simply am trying to write articles, add information to other articles and improve talk pages. I am not looking for Wikipedia wars with anyone. Bill Pollard (talk) 19:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wpollard: That's not how it works. If you click on the Contest button, it should take you to the Talk page of the article so you can explain why it shouldn't be deleted. Removing the tag itself has nothing to do with the button.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Wpollard, I accept the fact that you're not trying to start a war with anyone here but for now let us keep it simple by simply leaving any of our conversations from here on forward to an end. Hopefully, we can avoid any further conflicts.

Best of luck to you in the future, Yanjipy (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]