Talk:Francis Eric Bloy
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
F. Eric
[edit]I think this page should be back under "Francis Eric Bloy." Here's why: 1) Almost all bishops' pages are under their full names. 2) References I've found on the Web call him F. Eric Bloy, not Francis E. Bloy, so Francis Bloy would not be the expected title for his page (Eric Bloy would be more in keeping with what he was called, though I wouldn't advocate naming it that either.) While the Episcopal Church Annual lists him as "Francis E. I. Bloy" in its succession list, the Diocese of L.A.'s listing has him as F. Eric Bloy. ~ InkQuill 05:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, for all the reasons you've mentioned. In formal writing in the Episcopal Church, bishop's almost always get all their names. -- BPMullins | Talk 20:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)