Talk:Franklin News Foundation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Franklin News Foundation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

12.219.83.122 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (IP registered by ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE (IPI-15))

Zapped section - 440 non-existant congressional districts

I zapped: "Watchdog.org was featured in the Wall Street Journal when it became the first news organization in the country to provide a complete outline of all 440 non-existent congressional districts created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan website.<ref>{{cite web|author=Post |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704204304574544063776158046.html |title=Wall Street Journal |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=November 19, 2009 |accessdate=January 12, 2012}}</ref>" because the stated source did not say that. Feel free to add the statement back in when you have a source that supports the statement. Ratagonia (talk) 23:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good edit. I've done some work on this page in the past. It was much too promotional/self-sourcing, and it may still be, but I think it's better. Thanks for helping! Safehaven86 (talk) 00:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Metzler, Rebekah (October 2, 2010). "'Watchdog' website puts a new spin on politics". Portland Press Herald.

--Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wind and solar power

HughD, please explain where this source says that DT and DCF donated the $6.3 million specifically for a media campaign against wind and solar power. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 07:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See the lead of the 1st ref. Hugh (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not helpful. What specific language are you referring to? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

quote added to ref Hugh (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a lot more helpful if you put the quote in the discussion instead of using my question as an excuse to edit war. Btw I have started an WP:ORN discussion on this subject since we're scattered over 3 different articles. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This ref does not support the edit. I have weighed in at OR/N. Capitalismojo (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated info on this page

My name is Josh Kaib, and I am an employee of the Franklin Center. I wanted to point out that a few of the sections are outdated.

The second paragraph in the introduction cites an old mission statement. You can find the updated mission and vision statement here: http://franklincenterhq.org/about/

That link also gives the states where we have Watchdog.org news bureaus. The section "News bureaus and affiliates" is also outdated.

Thanks for taking a look and updated the page! We want to make sure the page has the most up to date info, and we are happy to help you update the page elsewhere as well with any publicly available information we can provide.

Joshkaib (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Updated both, thanks. And thanks for disclosing your conflict of interest and working through the talk page. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! If I spot anything else that is incorrect, I'll let you know. I appreciate it! Joshkaib (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed two other things that are out of date: the listing of awards won by Franklin Center journalists and the mention of Watchdog Wire on the "News bureaus and affiliates" section. This page lists awards we've won, with links to sources: http://franklincenterhq.org/awards-and-memberships/

Watchdog Wire was discontinued in 2014 and is no longer online. You'll notice the site is not online anymore.

Joshkaib (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Watchdog Wire

Thanks. Is there anything out there stating affirmatively that WW was or would be discontinued? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was a notice put up on the website, but the site is gone now. Here's the cache of the page. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Ou7lXBgZsbIJ:watchdogwire.com/blog/2014/12/23/weve-moved-come-join-us-watchdog-arena/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

It mentions something called "Watchdog Arena" which is a mostly inactive page on the Watchdog.org site. Joshkaib (talk) 19:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We can't use a Google cache, but here's a Wayback Machine archive we can use. However, the page doesn't say WW was discontinued, it says it was folded into Watchdog Arena. If Arena is mostly inactive, is it fair to presume that WW was never a particularly notable program? Would you object to the removal of WW from the article entirely? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No objection on deleting the WW reference. It was a minor program. Joshkaib (talk) 01:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]