Talk:GEORGE (programming language)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Origin and evolution of George

According to David A. Mindell, a professor at MIT, GEORGE was written by Hal Laning, an engineer at MIT's Instrument Laboratory. Laning writes in his 2008 book DIGITAL APOLLO (MIT Press) that Laning's creation lent its important equation handling concepts to FORTRAN. Can someone help resolve the discrepancy? Raryel (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's a different system: Laning and Zierler system

--Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by 50.163.162.160

This seems to be identical to the programming language named Forth, attributed to and designed by Moore_(Forth) - I don't know enough history to establish this, but the resemblamce is striking, and as a long-time user of Forth, I am surprised that ther eis no mention of Forth in either the text below or on the talk page. Fascinating! 50.163.162.160 (talk)‎ 12:21, 22 July 2015‎