Talk:Gabriel Nassif

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Magic: The Gathering

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Magic: The Gathering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Magic: The GatheringWikipedia:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringTemplate:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringMagic: The Gathering articles

Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?

Wetman

Untitled

Corrected the sentence. Fluorhydric 00:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Today's edit is win.

"Gabriel Nassif costs 2 French mana to play and gives all creatures +50/+50 and quad double strike."

It really does.

Possible NPOV violation

I believe the following statement violates the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view:

He won the tournament, despite playing a poorly built deck.

It is a biased statememnt, without reference. What is "poorly built"? According to who? How can it be poorly built if it won a tournament? Whether or not a deck is poorly built is a matter of opinion, and thus subject to bias. Should this statement be reworded or removed? Flashstorm 22:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is a POV statement without a source. I've attempted to look for a source that the deck was considered poorly built, but I haven't even found anything about the event yet. Jay32183 23:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, perhaps should it be removed until such a source is found? Or a citation needed notice? I'm personally still not convinced that it doesn't violate NPOV. Flashstorm 00:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it since this is a living person. We can't have Wikipedians belittling his deck building abilities. Jay32183 00:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Biography section could use an update regarding Nassif's recent Pro Tour and Grand Prix wins. Creet (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]