Jump to content

Talk:Gary Lambert (politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Controversy" section

[edit]

The "Controversy" section recently added by User:Minority Reporters seems to be disproportionate to the rest of the article. Read Wikipedia:Controversy sections for why this is a problem. The question, then, is how to fix it. Should the section be removed or rewritten, or should more positive material be added to balance it out? I'm leaning towards the latter, seeing how short the article already is, but I am unsure as to what positive material exists that could be used for this purpose... Perhaps something from the Concord Monitor's endorsement of Lambert? Link: Editorial: Lambert is the right choice for the GOP. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 17:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]