This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
As per BLP, a biography of a living person on Wikipedia should follow the NPOV. The old contraversies were properly kept in the contraversies section, particularly with reference to the FTC issue, and should be removed from the lead page. It's a request.Pkap1100 (talk) 04:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To the contrary, per WP:CSECTION, the practice now on Wikipedia is to avoid 'controversies' sections entirely, and instead to incorporate content on any controversy into the relevant parts of an article. And given that a significant proportion of legitimate coverage of Srinubabu revolves around issues concerning the journals, the subsequent 50 million dollar fine etc, it would be a gross violation of WP:NPOV policy not to discuss this in the lede at all.
The article as it stands is still in need of improvement, if it is to follow best practice for biographies. This would no doubt have been easier were it not for the relentless puffery, sockpuppetry and attempted whitewashing that has blighted it so far. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I suggest that ", and Doctorate at Stanford University" be removed from the alma mater section of the infobox; I have never seen a post-doc (it is a post-doc, and not a doctorate!) count as someone's alma mater within or outside Wikipedia. Kolekant (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
