Jump to content

Talk:General Aircraft Monospar ST-25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clarification

[edit]

Did the ST-25 have a single or twin-tail? Or was the mark produced in two versions? Drutt (talk) 19:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The variants section has the answer. MilborneOne (talk) 20:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here and here are images of G-AEDY in different configurations. I assume this is the sole "De Luxe" model that was converted? Drutt (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right G-AEDY was the De Luxe then the first Universal. MilborneOne (talk) 21:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:General Aircraft Monospar ST-25/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

good deal of basic info, needs more text on the aircraft itself --MoRsE 12:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 15:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Aircraft Monospar ST-25. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]