Talk:Generally recognized as safe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Food and drink (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Funny fact[edit]

"gras" means fat in French. Talam (talk) 00:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

References[edit]

The link in Ref #1 is broken. 152.5.254.24 (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Baobab GRAS[edit]

There seems no reason why this plant food should be singled out in the section on Designation, as it is simply one among many examples. Moving to Talk to preserve history. --Zefr (talk) 21:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

~~removed from Article~~

A recent innovative GRAS notification for baobab dried fruit pulp[1] successfully demonstrated safety to the FDA by using detailed analyses of the nutritional and phytochemical components in Baobab, without resorting to animal safety data.

This alternative approach, which not only saves unnecessary animal experiments but also saves hugely in the costs involved for approval, was used for the first time in a similar way to obtain "novel food" approval in the EU. Both approaches were pioneered by English scientist Dr John Wilkinson, in conjunction with Phytotrade Africa.

References

  1. ^ "Agency Response Letter GRAS Notice No. GRN 000273". Fda.gov. Retrieved 2009-09-06.

Where is the GRAS list?[edit]

Whenever I come to this Wiki page, I am looking for a link to the GRAS list, but never find it. I am not looking for the FDA.gov main page, or the enabling legislation, or FDA regulations, or FDA decisions about certain food additives, or commentaries/complaints about GRAS, or news items about certain GRAS chemicals, or FDA paper publications. All I want is the GRAS list itself, in alphabetic order by chemical name and common name for each of the 700+ food additives, with a brief description of each chemical and its uses in food. It is probably a PDF file with an index. Where on the Internet can I find the GRAS list itself? Greensburger (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Either ref. #7 in the Article or the EAFUS list now corrected as a link in External Links.[1] --Zefr (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Generally recognized as safe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Generally recognized as safe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)