Talk:Genetic discrimination

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katelynneller, B.johnson98. Peer reviewers: Liuxiaohao0927.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 5 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mesmith017, Sh1539, Meghanmcq. Peer reviewers: Mpf53, Rbullied, ReedNatalie, Kfreda, Rka77.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 June 2021 and 12 July 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jemappellecaitlin, Theworldisnotflat.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lyoflo1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Healthcare Discrimination

May be important to include Trump-Era attempts to allow genetic discrimination on the basis of pre-existing conditions. Upon trying to declare the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, unconstitutional, laws banning the discrimination and exclusion of individuals from healthcare or increased premiums due to pre-existing conditions would be repealed. It was a place of contention and stress, and poorly received by the approximate 70% of Americans that wanted existing conditions protections to remain. As many as 130 million US adults under age 65 have pre-existing conditions, accounting for a large amount of individuals who could have been denied from private insurances. Prior to the implementation of the ACA, 43 US states allowed upcharges for pre-existing conditions. Markups can range from thousands to tens of thousands of additional premiums per annum, depending on the condition. Additionally, pre-existing conditions qualify genetic predispositions that have no physically presented.

Sources: https://www.npr.org/2018/06/08/618263772/trump-administration-move-imperils-pre-existing-condition-protections https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/healthcare/news/2017/04/21/431019/premium-increases-pre-existing-conditions-latest-aca-repeal-plan-state/ https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2018/11/05/defining-pre-existing-conditions-in-an-era-of-genetic-testing/ jemappellecaitlinJemappellecaitlin (talk) 17:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theworldisnotflat (talk) 18:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laws elsewhere

You mention laws in other countries, which countries and what do their laws say?

Some text in this article was originally taken from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/info=genetic_testing/show/alltopics (public domain)

JAMA Vol. 300 No. 3, July 16, 2008 has a commentary entitled European Practices of Genetic Information and Insurance...basically, Europeans have had the laws for a while, but they're sort of useless based on technicalities. II | (t - c) 11:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Hi, the page "Genism" also covers the same topic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genism

A merger might be sensible. Bucoli (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree in the opposite direction. Merge Genetic Discrimination into Genism. -76.121.251.142 (talk) 23:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genism/genoism is an uncommon neologism for genetic discrimination. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone redirected the Genism article here without merging.

Please merge the information from the other artcile in to make this article more complete. Remember this is an encyclopedia and it is important to get as complete an overview as possible. Thanks.-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing there that seemed worth merging to me. If you disagree, the entire article history is still there at the redirect and you can merge whatever seems to you to be relevant to here.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genetic discrimination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726104538/http://www.gjga.org/inside.asp?a=1&action=item&source=documents&id=19 to http://www.gjga.org/inside.asp?a=1&action=item&source=documents&id=19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Sources, Expanding Examples of Genetic Discrimination in Other Countries, and Intersectionality Section

We will be fact-checking sources and adding new sources when necessary to improve this article. Additioanlly, we will provide examples of Genetic Discrimination in Canada and the United Kingdom.

Finally, it is important to mention the intersectionality of genetic discrimination, therefore we will be adding this section to the page. Lyoflo1 (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's important to mention intersectionality, but the current section is extremely confusing. I'm not an expert on intersectionality or genoism, so I can't offer to rewrite it. ThePedanticPrick (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added brief clarification about GINA with a citation. Katelynneller (talk) 15:18, 17 October 2019 (UTC)User:Katelynneller[reply]

I removed the references to the blogpost by Ewan Birney. This is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards (WP:RS). AndewNguyen (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding race and genetic discrimination section

Hi! I worked on expanding what was covered in the section that was previously called "race and genetics" and is now known as "race and genetic discrimination." Another wiki article "race and genetics" describes their intersection quite well, but there is still much to say about how discrimination plays in. I only had time to begin elucidating many related topics, but they deserve more attention. Negative health outcomes based upon genetic discrimination and race, genomic biobanks, and genetic genealogy projects could greatly benefit from further information if you are looking for a place to start. Many thanks! Sh1539 (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]