Talk:Ghosts in English-speaking cultures

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

North America Mid‑importance

	North America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

No discussions since October 2011

A "Merge from" template ({{Merge from|Ghost#Terminology|date=October 2011}}) has been placed in the Ghosts in English-speaking cultures#Terminology section since the 31st of October 2011 by User:Dbachmann with this edit difference. More than two and a half years have passed since then with no discussions arising. Maybe time is arrived to remove this template. M aurice 07:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you mean, to finally merge this long-standing {{duplication}} into Ghost? If so, please be my guest. The Ghost article does and should discuss English terminology. If this becomes too lengthy, there can be a discussion of "Ghost (terminology)" or something. But it will not do to discuss the English terminology on "ghosts" in an article pretending to be about "ghosts in English-speaking cultures". What does this even mean? This kind of stretches from Beowulf to Hollywood, and thus completely lacks any recognizable topical scope other that "Ghosts". --dab (𒁳) 10:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ghosts in English-speaking cultures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.greenmanreview.com/book/book_shippey_tolkien.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100412093007/http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/c7/c7s2.htm to http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/c7/c7s2.htm#c7s2l5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]