Talk:Gideon Rachman
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]According to his blog he was the business editor, not Charlemange.
http://blogs.ft.com/rachmanblog/2007/08/wikipedia-and-c.html
Wikimam 12:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Read the introductory entry on his blog: he was also Charlemagne. RCSB 12:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Here is where he claims this (read interest number 2 - Europe). RCSB 12:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- You're right! I thought I'd actually add your reference to his opening statement on his blog as a footnote and see where this goes :) Take a peek here [[1]] tho, maybe he forgot or - what's more likely - he's actually testing when and how fast the rabbit will pop out of the hat... Wikimam 14:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstood Gideon: He wrote his blog post before I corrected the entry. The original entry claimed that his last job at The Economist was Charlemagne. He meant to say that although he was indeed Charlemagne - this wasn't his last position at The Economist. But I am guessing you read his blog post after I had already corrected it (adding that he was also business editor - his last job). Therefore, you mistakenly surmised that he was referring to the corrected version as being incorrect. RCSB 14:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)