Talk:Gosses Bluff impact structure

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Gosses Bluff impact structure is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Northern Territory Low‑importance

	Australia portal Gosses Bluff impact structure is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Add Crater Infobox?

Someone may want to apply crater template {{Infobox crater | crater_name = {{SUBST:PAGENAME}} | image_crater = | alt_crater = | caption_crater = | image_bathymetry = | alt_bathymetry = | caption_bathymetry = | location = | coords = {{coord|89|59|59|N|179|59|59|W|region:ZZ_type:waterbody|display =inline,title}} | type = | basin_countries = | length = | width = | area = | depth = | max-depth = | volume = | rim = | elevation = | cities = | reference = }}

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gosses Bluff crater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051119074002/http://www.seeli.com/Daniel/person/pics/YABertrand/GosseBluffAUS.jpg to http://www.seeli.com/Daniel/person/pics/YABertrand/GosseBluffAUS.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gosses Bluff crater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512195029/http://www.parksandwildlife.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/10603/Tnorala_000.pdf to http://www.parksandwildlife.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/10603/Tnorala_000.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implication that impact was witnessed by Indigenous Australians

There is an implication in one paragraph that the impact was witnessed by Indigenous Australians. Whilst I don't doubt that their story might attribute it to an impact event, it is not a good idea to imply that they might have actually witnessed it. Doing so really just makes everyone look silly, since the impact was dated to the Jurassic, so either: Someone stuffed up monumentally in dating that thing; Or our entire knowledge of human history is wrong and humans coexisted with dinosaurs back in the Jurassic; Or somehow the paragraph needs to address the fact that Indigenous Australians couldn't have witnessed the formation of the crater. Rather, someone may have taken a good guess from another impact event that was witnessed to get an explanation of how this one formed. Basically, the paragraph needs to make the distinction between attributing a feature to an impact event and actually witnessing the impact event that created the feature^[1]. If it doesn't, it is rather misleading, especially since the sources are talking about impacts witnessed by Indigenous Australians. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 23:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to the paragraph headed Cultural significance, that's about a Dreamtime story. If you follow that link (it's also linked in the article), you will see that it's referring to a time before current people existed. It's a kind of mystical time. HiLo48 (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ we know that the Vredefort crater was formed by an impact event, but we damn sure didn't see that one, 'cos otherwise we'd all be dead

[1] we know that the Vredefort crater was formed by an impact event, but we damn sure didn't see that one, 'cos otherwise we'd all be dead

[1]