Talk:Granville Fuller House

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Granville Fuller House article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 24 October 2012 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Previous WP:AFC discussion

Moving from prior AFC comments at top of page

Comment: Error: There was no comment detected! Please follow the instructions at Template:AfC comment.While it's likely this building meets Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks), you need to fix the sourcing. A link to just a museum itself is not a reference, nor are other Wiki articles. Instead, link other Wiki articles via WP:Wikilinks.

We just need evidence of media, academic, or government coverage of this building for the article. Fortunately, Wiki has a full team of volunteers who cover these articles! Their guidelines for writing new articles are here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_National_Register_of_Historic_Places/Style_guide. If you wish to speak to other specialists, you can contact them here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

Comment: Error: There was no comment detected! Please follow the instructions at Template:AfC comment. I'm a new commenter here so please forgive me if i make an error. The topic of any National Register-listed place is generally fine, especially in Colorado where good full-length National Register nomination documents are available on-line. (Addendum: unfortunately the full nomination document is not yet available online for this one, as a new listing.--doncram) The article topic is definitely valid. Is some of the text here just copied from this "yourhub.denverpost.com" webpage, however? It's a good source. You need to cite your sources explicitly, and use your own wording and perhaps short quotes from a source like that. If the article is started, feel free to let me know at my Talk page and I could help out more. Hope this helps. --do ncr am 21:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Another editor added an infobox and i put in an available picture, below. Is this an article being drafted? I don't understand what is supposed to happen at AFC, and whether this is a drafting place or not. I am confused by the statement above that the AFC request was denied. It is an obviously valid topic. Should we not draft a proper article here? --do ncr am 14:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

rewrite to avoid plagiarism needed

Hi, i was participating earlier in the RFC process, and now see the article is published, in mainspace. Great... but the revisions so far have not addressed the issue of copying in the text. From the now-cited YourHub Denver Post source:

The Fuller House is ...(snipped later)...

From the article now:

The Fuller House is ...(snipped later)...

Those passages are exactly the same! This is not acceptable. It is plagiarism if the original writer is not given adequate credit for their work, i.e. if their wording is not credited by explicit quotes, or if the material is not appropriately paraphrased into other words. It is not enough to just note the other source. --do ncr am 18:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks editor MatthewVanitas for editing the article to remove duplicated text. That takes care of it. Now, it's a bit short as an article, but anyone can add more material, in our own words or with short quotes from sources. Thanks! --do ncr am 01:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]