Talk:Gravity Discovery Centre
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gravity Discovery Centre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
comments from May 2020
[edit]Are you flippin' kidding me? Are you flippin' kidding me? The only reason the vast vast vast majority of people know anything about this tower is solely and only because of the '44' club. Half the visits to the article are because of the '44' club. Without the creativity and innovation the Boys this tower would be a totally underused and unappreciated pile of scrap. And all they get is a footnote? More people have learned more about physics from their videos than Galileo and MIT put together. [rem486] Rem486 (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
"More people have learned more about physics from their videos than Galileo and MIT put together." LOL what else can be said! People already knew gravity exists and what it does! They provide no educational value! So how did they get to use the public facility anyway? Is it open for hire to anyone? Or just special people who have contacts in the right place? Cause the way they use it is not what it is designed for and looks like abuse!--HalloHelloHalloHello (talk) 04:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit]I will be expanding on this article and adding more photos, as part of the Guerilla Skeptics on Wikipedia project (Science Museums)TedDougal'n'Jack (talk) 04:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- could you possibly expand on what actually means ? - it might encourage further involvement... thanks JarrahTree 06:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
What do you mean by 'expand on what actually means'?TedDougal'n'Jack (talk) 08:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- well, for a start - maybe something about as part of the Guerilla Skeptics on Wikipedia project, or whatever the expansion is involved with - if there was a link to the project or related material. As your contributions history shows nothing that might actually link the idea with some background or whatever... JarrahTree 10:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- OK, here is the link to what the project is about... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Gerbic#Guerrilla_Skepticism_on_Wikipedia TedDougal'n'Jack (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- thanks for that, best of luck. JarrahTree 05:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Western Australia articles
- Low-importance Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Western Australian Wheatbelt Project articles
- C-Class Museums articles
- Low-importance Museums articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English