Talk:Greater London Authority
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Established and buildings
[edit]What date established? What buildings etc (apart from that by Tower Bridge) bear the GLA's mark? I have collected examples of the GLA's predecessors but there seem to be none for it. Jackiespeel 17:57, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
Ken
[edit]Some mention should be made of Ken's putative suspension. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.198.250.7 (talk • contribs) .
Population?
[edit]What is the population of the area controlled by the GLA? Shouldn't that be included in an article about a government agency that is the top level local government? --TGC55 16:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- The GLA controls Greater London. All the information is there. DJR (T) (WC) 22:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Logo
[edit]Is the logo so copyright protected that it cannot be shown here (and it seems in many GLA pages)?--SilasW (talk) 09:28, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Sleep joke
[edit]Last night I invented the following joke in my sleep. It's not a very funny joke, but quite sophisticated given that I was asleep at the time!
- Why did Boris stand for Mayor? To get greater London authority.
149.241.221.56 (talk) 08:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
London Datastore
[edit]Should some mention be made of this [1]? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Planning section
[edit]'As of 2006...' Are there more up to date figuresJackiespeel (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Greater London Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928044208/http://www.publictechnology.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=4095 to http://www.publictechnology.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=4095
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071123072106/http://www.communities.gov.uk/citiesandregions/regional/greaterlondonauthority/greaterlondon/ to http://www.communities.gov.uk/citiesandregions/regional/greaterlondonauthority/greaterlondon/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060925234736/http://www.london.gov.uk/londonissues/sustainability.jsp to http://www.london.gov.uk/londonissues/sustainability.jsp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071129183722/http://www.bowgroup.org/harriercollectionitems/LondonUnderLivingstoneFINALv2.pdf to http://www.bowgroup.org/harriercollectionitems/LondonUnderLivingstoneFINALv2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Infobox broken
[edit]Something has happened that means that the workaround in the 'leadership' section of the infobox is no longer working - it displays a whole bunch of gobbledegook below the initial heading. Furius (talk) 19:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)