Talk:Greenside Mine

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Greenside Mine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Greenside Mine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 November 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that large holes on the side of a Cumbrian mountain show where 18th-century mine workings in Greenside Mine have collapsed?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Greenside Mine.

Wikipedia

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article layout

The sections that will be used as this article develops, and the order they come in, will probably become clear with time - they may well vary from my initial plans. However, the research I've done so far suggests that the following areas will probably get a section each.

The ore deposit
Business issues (covering ownership, capitalisation, mineral rights, leases and management)
Underground workings
Ore preparation (crushing, separating the galena, smelting, etc.)
Employment issues (working conditions, pay, housing, etc.)
Transportation
Water and electrical power
Environmental issues
Ancillary activities (the mine had its own farm, and got involved in other things too)
Operation Orpheus
Access and work done since closure

Please feel free to contribute to any of these areas if you are able to do so, or suggest better ways of wording these section headings. Silence-is-infinite (talk) 09:51, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Initial article drafting completed, covering the topics above. In the end environmental issues did not get a separate section but were included as they arose. Ancillary activities also did not get a separate section. Housing was included in employment issues, the road haulage company was included in transport, and the farm was not deemed important enough to warrant inclusion in an article which had already grown far longer than first anticipated. Set article category to B at this stage. Silence-is-infinite (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Greenside Mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References to Murphy

This article contains an enormous number of references to Murphy. This means they swamp the reference list, making it difficult to quickly see what other sources the article is referring to. It could also give an impression that the article is a summary of, or perhaps a guide to, Murphy’s book. I thought about putting the Murphy refs into their own reflist, thus retaining the level of detail without the swamping problem, but I can’t see how to do that with sfn templates – they don’t have a group parameter and I haven’t yet found a workaround. Another option would be to replace the page numbers with chapter numbers. That would lose a level of detail but could hopefully reduce the space taken by Murphy references ay the end. For example references 53-57 would all be to chapter 11. As this would be a major change to the article, it would need discussion before trying it out. --Northernhenge (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]