Talk:Grey noise
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
Plagarism?
[edit]It appears the text of this article is taken verbatim from http://www.ptpart.co.uk/show.php?contentid=71 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.245.8.28 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC).
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Another criterion
[edit]I seem to remember a political criterion by which white noise is an utterance which makes sense, though it might be insincere, and you know where it's 'coming from.' Gray/Grey noise is meaningful but unattributed; black noise is meaningless. Example: If a dictator issues a glowing statement about his country's progress in the government-controlled papers, that's white noise: white because it makes sense and you know who said it; noise because it isn't true. If you tune in on a 'pirate radio' broadcast, it's gray noise--the words make sense, but you don't know whether it's true or not because you can't tell who is responsible for it. Black noise, I guess, is just meaningless static, perhaps meant to jam broadcasts of the other two types. Does anybody have any references for anything like that??