Talk:Grimethorpe Hall
Appearance
A fact from Grimethorpe Hall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the abandoned 17th-century Grimethorpe Hall (pictured) in South Yorkshire, England, has been proposed as a potential new headquarters for the Grimethorpe Colliery Band? Source: Not got it to hand but from "Nooks and Corners". Private Eye. No. 1577. 15 July 2022. p. 22.
- ALT1: ... that Barnsley Council cannot order repairs be made to the abandoned 17th-century Grimethorpe Hall (pictured) as it is owned by the Crown Estate? Source: Again, ditto, from: "Nooks and Corners". Private Eye. No. 1577. 15 July 2022. p. 22.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/William Penney, Baron Penney
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 10:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC).
- Reviewing the DYK nom now:
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: There is a quotation in last para that needs direct sourcing. Template:Infobox building can be used in the article. Rest all seems ok to me. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Dharmadhyaksha, I've duplicated the ref for the quote. I must say I am fairly ambiguous on infoboxes in this and similar articles. I don't object if someone else adds them (and they often do so anyway during the DYK appearance) but the effort of doing so doesn't seem worth it here when there would be little to add except construction and listing date, I'd sooner be working on the next article! - Dumelow (talk) 07:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- good to go on main page! Both options are good. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)