Talk:Guerilla Cricket
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spectator source
[edit][1] is clearly listed as a blog, and therefore I do not believe that it qualifies as a reliable source. Thoughts? Ritchie333 ? Joseph2302 18:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- I can't think of any reason why The Spectator is unreliable, but I changed the text to just say it's controversial. Even an opinion piece has to have had some editorial control and judgement in order to be published against a near 200-year old work. Perhaps the text was getting confused with Test Match Sofa, with whom I believe the ECB came down on like a ton of bricks. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Guerilla Cricket page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Guerilla Cricket" page.