Talk:Gunparade March

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Anime and manga (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
Wikipe-tan head.png This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-class on the assessment scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Video games (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Demographic[edit]

I think this anime it's not seinen, it's Shōnen, I have changed it MrVicVega 16:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

its actually all of these: Drama, Mecha, Romance, Sci Fi, Shounen, Slice Of Life, Military Mokaiba11 (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Gunparade Orchestra[edit]

I think Gunparade Orchestra must have a separate article since it bears no relation to March's storyline. E Wing (talk) 16:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

What is PBE for?[edit]

I can guess PBE might mean Phantom Beast Eraser, but nowhere in the page an explanation of the acronym is given.--Abacos (talk) 10:37, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


PBE is a massive, "pulse-emitting bomb" it is technically PEB but is stated as PBE. Mokaiba11 (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

anime[edit]

added episodes Mokaiba11 (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

revamp it, added some more stuff, and organized Mokaiba11 (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

added spin-off, revised some more areas, all episodes for spinoff are there with airted date...someone else can finsih adding them Mokaiba11 (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Images FYI[edit]

FYI

  • One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:

       The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
       The nature of the copyrighted work
       The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
       The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work

Mokaiba11 (talk) 11:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


edit war[edit]

my edits are not an edit war if I am adding content to the artice, the one at fault for this edit war is Farix who keeps reverting to an old page without the new additions and he doesnt even write in the discussion. Mokaiba11 (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

An edit war is when two parties are continually reverting back and forth. Two parties. Either two people are edit warring, or no one is. You can't try to claim high ground and state "my edits are not an edit war, but HIS ARE!" -- it doesn't make sense. If Farix is edit warring against you, then you are warring against him by definition. Stop it, and wait for other editors to chime in. Jsharpminor (talk) 21:28, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I've attempted to clean up the mess that Mokaiba made of the article and get it to conform with other article in the same subject area. However, it is Mokaiba who has been reverting every all of my attempts sight unseen and even requesting rollback privileges so that they can "revert faster".[1] Mokaiba has show a blatant WP:OWNership over the article and has prevented other users from making changes to their edits. At no point did I actually revert Mokaiba. Instead, I've attempted to reformat the contents to match Wikipedia's standards and remove anything that was obviously original research, such as the over half dozen "genres" Mokaiba tried to add, extrusions plot detail, or just didn't belong, such as a non-English licensee in an English licensee field and two obsolete infobox fields. —Farix (t | c) 21:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Shifting out commented out material[edit]

The article is full of material that is commented out and thus invisible to readers. Some of it has been this way for nearly 9 months. I can see from the talkpage that there has been a bit of argument over what should be removed and what should stay and I don't want to get into that, but commenting out large swaths of text for months-long periods is not an appropriate use of comments per WP:COMMENT. I'm moving the material here for the time being.

If this material can be re-incorporated into the article then that's fine, but if not it should be removed from the article and not simply commented out. -Thibbs (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)