Talk:Guru Gaddi

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed deletion[edit]

The subject page is meant for deletion.

But I dont understand why. May the article is not fully able to relate to the importance of the subject.

Guru-da-Gaddi is an important occasion of Sikh Religion. This is very very important time when the tenth Guru had stated that the next Guru is the Holy Sikh Book "Guru Granth sahib". I don't feel such an artcile should be deleted. Rest is Wikipedia policy. It is recommended that Sikh Scholars may be consulted on the subject. I am proud that I tried to create an article on the subject.Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 17:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify what exactly Guru-da-Gaddi is? It's not mentioned in the Sikhism article. Is Guru-da-Gaddi the event when the tenth guru made the statement, or is it a festival on the anniversary of that event, or what? Whatever it is, the article should say that in its first sentence. —KCinDC (talk) 17:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for my unnecessary anger since everything is OK. The Guru-da-Gaddi is an occasion of sikh religion and this year its the tercentenary celebrations of the occasion. I have removed the deletion notice. Sorry but could not resist. But I cannot understand why the page is being deleted. May be you have not been to Punjab in India. Sorry. Rest is your decision.Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct title[edit]

The correct title is "Gur-ta-Gaddi". Please see this official link for more information.http://www.gurtagaddinanded.com/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.96.167.164 (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see these news items:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3616597.cms http://www.tribuneindia.com/khalsa/page4.htm http://www.tribuneindia.com/2008/20081020/world.htm#4 http://www.coastweek.com/3142-17.htm http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19990407/ile07072.html http://www.punjabnewsline.com/content/view/13106/38/ http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Three-hundred-years-of-faith/375238/ http://www.hindu.com/2008/10/21/stories/2008102154370500.htm http://www.hindu.com/mag/2008/10/26/stories/2008102650010100.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.96.167.164 (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. So it looks like Gur-ta-Gaddi is the consecration of the Guru Granth Sahib, not the celebration. The celebration is for the anniverary of Gur-ta-Gaddi. Should the name at least be mentioned in the Guru Granth Sahib article? Maybe this article should be merged into that one, since this doesn't seem to have that much new content. —KCinDC (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I still believe that whether its GurudiGaddi aur/or Gurtagaddi. The thing is that Sikh scholars are not aware of Wikipedia. I am a Hindu Sikh. Kindly don't delete the article. Request to kindly contact #Sikh #Scholars. regards

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Guru Gaddi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070316122505/http://www.maharashtra.gov.in:80/english/chiefminister/On_path_of_progress.pdf to http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/chiefminister/On_path_of_progress.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]