Talk:Haft Gumbaz
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Haft Gumbaz appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 August 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 07:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Haft Gumbaz complex (pictured) contains the tombs of the Bahmani dynasty? "The other group of Bahmani Tombs known as the Haft Gumbaz or "Seven Domes" contains memorials of four kings of this dynasty, .." (Indian Architecture (The Islamic Period) By Percy Brown)
- ALT1:... that a social activist has been fighting against encroachments at the Haft Gumbaz (pictured)? "When no action was forthcoming from local officials of the ASI, Mr. Mujeebuddin took up the issue with the circle office of ASI in Dharwad, and later filed an application under the Right to Information Act seeking information on the action taken to remove the illegal structure and the penalty imposed. "(The Hindu)
Created/expanded by $ufyan (talk). Self-nominated at 00:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC).
- Article:
- Created on July 9, nominated the same day.
- Long enough.
- No issues with neutrality.
- Hook:
- Interesting (never knew of the existence of that dynasty). Both reliable sources cited on the article check.
- Within the character count.
- I'd pick Hook number one. The second is ok, but I'm not sure most people is aware of the dynasty.
- QPQ: Not needed. This user has less than DYK's to his credit.
- No issues with the image.
- Good to go.
Categories:
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Karnataka articles
- Unknown-importance Karnataka articles
- C-Class Karnataka articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Karnataka articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Cemeteries articles
- Low-importance Cemeteries articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles