Talk:Hasso Spode
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ossah23 (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
The entry has been tagged for serval reasons. In this connection, previous editors have been criticized in an estonishingly rude tone ("inappropriate", "horrendous", "excessive"). The reason for ignoring Wikipedia's courtesy rules is is not comprehensible. The same applies to most of the points listed in the tag. In detail:
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for academics. (April 2022) Acc. to the guidelines one of 8 items should be fulfilled; at least 3 do meet these criteria: 1) scholarly impact - cf. Google, Google Scholar, Researchgate etc. 4) impact on higher edication - many works in university libraries, cf. Worldcat 7) impact outside academia - many interviews and articles in the media (radio, TV, magazines); a selection here: https://news.google.com/search?q=hasso%20spode&hl=de&gl=DE&ceid=DE%3Ade or http://hasso-spode.de/spode.html#Medien In addition book-reviews in the media (Zeit, Spiegel etc.).
This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (April 2022) There is no puffery. Randykitty (who has tagged the entry) has qualified the words "international" and "penned" and a hint to Worldcat as "horrendous stub" and deleted it. Hoewever, Worldcat may be incomplete but it is a source widly used in Wikipedia. Inserted again.
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. (September 2009) Difficult, since except for numerous short biographies in books there is only an autobiographical scetch. However, basic data e.g. https://portal.dnb.de/opac.htm?method=simpleSearch&cqlMode=true&query=nid%3D132838788 or https://viaf.org/viaf/17503473/
This article relies too much on references to primary sources. (May 2010) Outdated. The distiction in primary and secondary does not apply in this case. The point here is whether a source ist "reliable" or not. Books and articles published from etablished publishers are reliable sources . The bibliography has been enlarged in this sense; also some English articles have been added. (By the way, there is a a seconary source dealing with Spode's works.)
This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (April 2022) This point looks far from the NPOV. Please explain source-basedly.
What remains, is a rather shaky ground of Spode's bio; but for the time beeing there are no better sources available. A poblem that countless entries on living persons have. Thus, after some changes, the tag can be removed.
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles