Talk:Hawker 400

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Main pic[edit]

I was searching for an inflight main pic and saw there are excellent inflight JASDF pics to choose from :

single

multiples

Which are your best ones?--Marc Lacoste (talk) 09:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

None of those would be suitable for a lead image, one like this would be better:. MilborneOne (talk) 14:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Hawker 400XPs not Hawker 400.[edit]

A Hawker 400 is a HS-125 airplane from the 60s and 70s. Beechjets were never sold under the name Hawker 400, only under Hawker 400XP. Perhaps we should change the article name to reflect this, maybe even add a page about the actual Hawker 400. Here is a picture of a 400.

Hawker 400 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.218.235.130 (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 125-400 was only really used the "Hawker 400" name in the USA so it is covered in the British Aerospace 125 article with all the other 125 variants. It was no a particularly common name for the Series 400 so unlikely to need an article with that name MilborneOne (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hawker 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307210644/http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/customer_support/technical_publications/docs/nontechnical/serializationList.pdf to http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/customer_support/technical_publications/docs/nontechnical/serializationList.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hawker 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100519052919/http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/hawker/400xp/ to http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/hawker/400xp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Performance[edit]

My removal of the paragraph on performance was reverted by User:Marc Lacoste but really it just look like a dump from a biz jet review journal and not the style or prentation text we normally use in these articles. Looks like it was straight out of a sales brochure and not really suited hereMilborneOne (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being from a biz jet review journal is a good thing for a biz jet, the source is quite authoritative: [Fred George (Dec 10, 2014). "Operators Survey: Beechjet 400A/Hawker 400XP/Nextant 400XT". Business & Commercial Aviation.] (Aviation Week network). Style isn't easy for performance figures, some help would be welcome. But style is not a reason for deleting referenced information. It is quite the opposite of a sales brochure: those are figures from the real world, not best cases with low empty weights and fringe ranges. Cheers,--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]