Talk:Heath W. Lowry

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Alternative Views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative Views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename of Category

Some of you may wish to participate in the discussion on renaming the category Armenian Genocide deniers to Armenian Genocide skeptics. The discussion is here. --Anthon.Eff (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bias article

There is no mention of academic achievements of Heath Lowry. He changed the foundation history of Ottoman Empire. Article only deals with his views of Armenian Genocide. I wonder who wrote that???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.45.247.210 (talk) 09:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV claims

I'm reverting multiple edits that were made with the claim that there is "too much weight placed on revisionism not taken seriously." I think the large deletion of information deserves some sort of explanation. I'm not sure what the claim is here, or how these edits bring the article back to WP:NPOV. Please discuss here. --Iamozy (talk) 23:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It feels like dragging the historian Heath W. Lowry's name through the mud Alexis Ivanov (talk) 23:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Please explain how the article is disparaging to Lowry. The article covers his career, his reviews, his publications, and his criticisms. Do you think that the article focuses too much on the criticisms? --Iamozy (talk) 00:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To summarize it for someone I assume with no knowledge on the subject, Lowry is more or less as credible as Joseph Goebbels. The Armenian Genocide is universally accepted among credible historians, giving any weight to Lowry's garbage violates WP:UNDUE. If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong on Wikipedia, regardless of whether it is true or you can prove it, except perhaps in some ancillary article.

~~User:Resnjari The above goes for all the articles you keep vandalizing as well. --Lasort101 (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

User:Lasort101, i am vandalizing? On what grounds ? You have been going around and removing peer reviewed material, large chunks of it and giving very limited explanations of it if at all. If you want to do those types of big edits, first of you need to outlined them in the talkpage and gain consensus. Otherwise this can go to the noticeboards. I am very familiar with the literature on the Armenian genocide, as my interests on ethnic cleaning of Muslims in the Balkans have made me delve into that area too. I am no novice on the matter.Resnjari (talk) 06:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't work like that, I'm removing content that directly violates the guidelines. Please familiarize yourself with WP:WEIGHT. Armenian Genocide deniers are a small minority among historians. --Lasort101 (talk) 02:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lasort101, This is an article on Heath Lowry, so providing accurate coverage of his work and views is not WP:UNDUE. You are deleting factual, referenced content to suit a bias that is not appropriate here. If you feel content needs to be added, by all means go ahead. --Iamozy (talk) 18:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that multiple editors think that this article is violating WP:NPOV. One editor thinks the article is too critical of Lowry, another thinks the article gives too much credit to Lowry's research and opinions. To avoid edit-warring, I'm posting this claim to the NPOV Noticeboard. --Iamozy (talk) 18:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lasort101 = another CHECKUSER blocked sock of User:Steverci

Just a heads up to the other editors here. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 04:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]