Talk:Hengoed Viaduct

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	January 17, 2018

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Listed atatus

The article stated this is one of two listed viaducts in Wales, citing [1]. Grade_II*_listed_buildings_in_Wrexham_County_Borough lists two more, so I've removed the referenced. Aoeuidhtns (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hengoed Viaduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402214255/http://www.crumlinviaduct.co.uk/htmImages/Hengoed.htm to http://www.crumlinviaduct.co.uk/htmImages/Hengoed.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership transfer & date

This doesn't change the sense of anything, but for precision,

"its ownership was transferred from British Rail to Railway Paths Ltd in 1999."

Should be,

"its ownership was transferred by BRB (Residuary) Limited to Railway Paths in 2001."

The exact date of the transfer was 30 July 2001, by which time British Rail has ceased to be and its residual assets were being managed by BRB (Residuary) Limited. It is their name that appears on the conveyance. Unusually, the change of title was not registered until 27 May 2002, ref CYM73673 available from HM Land Registry.

None of this really matters which is why it's on this talk page without an edit request. Dpembert (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The new editor Dpembert started making a series of changes to similar articles on 9 March 2021, generally complaining that content was wrong and deleting or over-writing references; until requested by myself to make a conflict of interest declaration and to stop directly-editing other similar articles, Dpembert was unaware of the Wikipedia policy stating "COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia."

The article was edited by IkbenFrank on 8 August 2016 to state that Railway Paths Ltd acquired in 1999, per this source at Railway Paths. I have subsequently established that the website was changed at some point in between 2020 and 2021 to reflect that ownership was ascribed to Railway Paths in 2001. NB, their website avoids use of 'ownership', stating instead " In 2001, the viaduct was entrusted to Railway Paths..."

The article was correct to source when written and I've requested Dpembert to undertake internal enquiries within his organisation, Railway Paths Ltd, shown as Railway Paths, to ascertain why and when these changes were made and to collate how many WP articles are affected.

I have generally edited this article with what I consider as improvements; I don't intend to make further changes, and I'm not suggesting anyone else does imminently, regarding the change of ownership date, due to the circumstances identified. It's not incumbent on WP editors to have to be encumbered with this responsibility or considerable imposition, IMO. Editors are reminded that secondary sources are preferred, per WP:SECONDARY. Of course, these would unlikely be changed in such a manner.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]