Talk:Heroes Reborn (1996 comic)

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Memories

Do they keep their memories from their lives previous to Heroes Reborn?

More plot?

Can someone add more story info from the actual runs to this entry? I haven't read the Heroes Reborn project and I have found there is precious little information either in this entry or in the individual character entries about the stories and their differences from the regular Marvel Universe. This just popped into my head today as I was browsing DK's Avengers guide and found the Heroes Reborn Avengers team line-up, which aside from including Cap and Thor among its ranks I knew absolutely nothing about beforehand. - WesleyDodds 06:13, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heroes Reborn #½

Heroes Reborn #½, published by Wizard, might need to be added to the Bibliography. I haven't read it, so I don't know if it's additional story or excerpt material. - Esimmons 2 April 2006

Sam Loeb scholarship fund

A few sentences noting how the upcoming "Onslaught Reborn" series would benefit this fund were removed from the article for being unsourced. However, the outside link at the bottom of that section points to an article that does, in fact, mention this. This site quotes Jeph Loeb as follows:

"Dan [Buckley] saw a way to make a connection here between a project that I had been involved in ten years ago - combined with my friendship with Rob [Liefeld] -- to tie it into The Fund and create something special. Suddenly, we were presented with a way to reach a wide audience and at the same time offer a huge contribution to the Fund."

It's a long article and that quote is buried in the middle, but it is there. Consequently, I've put a reference to it back into the Wikipedia article (albeit a shorter one). However, if you have other issues with it (you don't think the source is valid, you think that this information is irrelevant, etc.), we can certainly discuss it. --GentlemanGhost 10:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding this and editing it back in. --Chris Griswold 00:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, two of the references that I added to article, including this one, were removed. Then the article was tagged as unreferenced. Lame. It wasn't the tagger's fault, though. In any case, I've add them back in. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Art onslaught11.jpg

Image:Art onslaught11.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Art onslaught11.jpg

Image:Art onslaught11.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Heroes Reborn (miniseries) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Heroes Reborn (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071224164738/http://popcultureshock.com/?p=40183 to http://popcultureshock.com/?p=40183

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]