Talk:Hewitt School

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Overhaul for tone, etc.

Hi. I've just made substantial changes to this article.

I removed puffery and promotional language, including categorically unverifiable statements.
I added the unsourced section template to several sections, as they provide no sources whatsoever.
I removed a statement about student-teacher ratio from the lead, as it was not stated elsewhere in the article, the source provided contained no such information, and other sources I found were unreliable and conflicted with each other.
I removed two names from the notable alumnae section after conducting WP:BEFORE and determining that they were not notable (see WP:LISTBIO).
I added sources to two names in the notable alumnae section and redlinked them, as they qualify to have their own articles.
I fixed various grammatical errors in the article.
I marked several dead references as such.

Comments: This article is in dire need of quality primary sources. Even with my edits, it functions much more as an advertisement than a source of encyclopedic information. With the exception of the sources I added (which are rather unimportant to the scope of the article), the article relies exclusively on self-published sources that are not independent of the subject. I may do some more work on this article at some point, but I have other projects that I want to see through first. I'm leaving this message in hopes that someone else out there might want to help get it up to standard per WP:MOS.

Thanks! Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]