Talk:Hilbert R-tree
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Computer Science Project
[edit]I'm cleaning up some domain specific jargon, specifically I'm changing MBR to "Minimum Bounding Rectangle" to make the content more accessible for casual readers.
Backwards copy
[edit] | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
This is a bit ambiguous, but our copy dates from 2007, and Worldcat knows of no revisions of this book prior to 2008, nor can I find any other papers that might be a parent source for both. Google Books link --User:Joe Decker (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Figure 2
[edit]The article reads "Figure 2 illustrates the intuitive reasons why our Hilbert-based methods will result in good performance. The data is composed of points (the same points as given in Figure 1)." This sound as if fig. 2 contains the actual results of tree build on the sample points, but it does not. Is part of figure 2 missing? --2A02:6B8:0:3903:E52C:6F19:D6D6:61AF (talk) 09:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Cleanup Template
[edit]I just removed the cleanup template, which did not have any cleanup reason attached, and was from 2008. The article looks decent to me. Anyone have specific cleanup requests? --YoavShapira (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)