This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
No attempt at objectivity. The statement that the discharge and repatriation of the men was illegal requires further justification where it is based on their being 'deported. There is nothing in the archive to substantiate the claim that any of the men were made subject of deportation orders under the 1919 Alien Act. They were contract seamen who were no longer required and, except for those who were married to British women, whom the reports identify as special cases, were simply told to report for embarkation in accordance with the terms of their articles. The same procedure applied to surplus Greek seamen in Cardiff.
The claim that the government covered up the affair is sensationalist nonsense and has no basis in the records cited and is merely repetition of someone else's unfounded assertion. 80.2.237.179 (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
