Talk:Hostile media effect

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Article[edit]

This article is so biased against those of us with forward-thinking progressive values. Whoever wrote this article is just trying to make excuses for Fox News's 24/7 racist propaganda machine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.242.181.242 (talk) 14:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it seems that the hostile media effect is working. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.180.60.103 (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A criteria for neutrality?[edit]

does this come to say that one that can show criticism from many sides is essentially neutral and in the middle? Shiftadot (talk) 15:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hastorf and Cantril?[edit]

The article lists participants in Hastorf and Cantril both seeing "many more infractions committed by the opposing side" though this is not technically correct; students from both schools noted about 4 infractions committed by Dartmouth, yet students from Princeton noted about 4 infractions committed by themselves and students from Dartmouth noted about 10 infractions committed by Princeton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigminisachin1231 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disconfirmation bias[edit]

I think the paragraph that mentions disconfirmation bias is really confusing. It redirects to confirmation bias, but the confirmation bias article doesn't use the word or at least I didn't notice it there. For one thing, we don't need two redirects to the same place in one sentence. For another, the redirect doesn't shed light on what the word means. Perhaps we could define the word instead or if the sentence before it is the definition, perhaps could say "which is called disconfirmation bias". I think that might make it more clear :-) Bali88 (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]