Talk:House of European History

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union Low‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article relates to Brussels, and should follow the Brussels naming conventions.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... we, as the European parliament, try to add to Wikipedia an article on the House of European History project, which is in no mean for promotional purposes. We try to explain the European project through this page and we make links to existing related pages. The House of European History has no commercial purpose either.--Policyteam (talk) 14:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EastmanBuilding.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:EastmanBuilding.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:EastmanBuilding.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:EP map.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:EP map.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status as of 24 February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:EP map.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critics

A dumbed-down ideological museum[1] Xx236 (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The professor's opinion is serious and reliable. Please don't impose your POV.

Critics call it an EU vanity project [2]
Others said the project amounted to an act of historical revisionism. [3]
chaos and illegibility [4]

Xx236 (talk) 06:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Platform of European Memory and Conscience will publish its report in November. As far a Polish historian has published his opinion:

http://www.rp.pl/Plus-Minus/310269917-Spektakularna-porazka-Domu-Historii-Europejskiej.html Xx236 (talk) 07:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Piotr Madajczyk criticizes WWW pages of the Museum [5]. Xx236 (talk) 08:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on House of European History. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110228184013/http://www.tpf.eu/red4net/pub_content.asp?content=1&id=444&pmi=22 to http://www.tpf.eu/red4net/pub_content.asp?content=1&id=444&pmi=22

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]