This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
@Sionk: I can see why you tagged the article for questionable notability. I spent quite a while pondering this when reviewing the draft, but concluded that on balance he met the first criteria of WP:NACADEMIC, specifically having a "substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates". Of course, 'substantial' and 'significant' are deliberately subjective terms in the guideline, and I am happy to be challenged if you think Wall falls short on this test. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I misunderstood how Google Citation Scholar works. If we believe 75 articles have been cited 4000 times in total, it sounds 'substantial' enough for me. Sionk (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
