Talk:Huechulafquen Lake

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Huechulafquen Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Argentina

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Huechulafquen Lake, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Google finds lots of references to a Lake Huechulafquen, but it's in Patagonia Argentina, not Nicaragua. Either the article is just totally wrong, or there's at least two lakes by that name. I suspect the latter, but still the one in Argentina is much more well known -- ProveIt ^(talk) 15:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pategonia Argentina Lakes ProveIt ^(talk) 15:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even worse, it turns out Patagonia links here ProveIt ^(talk) 15:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For whatever reason my {{prod|because}} rationale does not appear within the text of the prod template (too much text?), so in the interests of perfect transparency, I am reproducing it here:

ProveIt flagged this article as factually disputed and unverifiable via google. I did some research and I too cannot find any reference to the lake's existence in Southern Nigaragua (google: Huechulafquen "southern nicaragua" -patagonia = 1 result, to this article); all references under a general search are to the lake in Patagonia. The author's statement that the lake is "196 feet wide" can be taken as an admission or at least indicia of non-notability. As some time has passed without further verification by the author, this article appears to be waste of space.--Fuhghettaboutit 21:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's another solution--just change it to the lake we know exists and be done with it. --Fuhghettaboutit 13:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had considered doing that, but it didn't seem quite "kosher". However, when this one is gone I plan to create a stub for the one in Patagonia. -- ProveIt ^(talk) 14:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ... someones done that already. I guess the problem is resolved. ProveIt ^(talk) 14:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, that's what I was referring to. I also felt it wasn't kosher somehow, but not enough to mind someone else doing it. --Fuhghettaboutit 23:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]