Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Florence (1988)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Florence (1988) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 30, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 22, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Florence rainfall in the Yucatan?

[edit]

Now that I know this "unknown" quote is in the article, I'll run the storm through the Mexican database tomorrow and add the storm on Monday when I get back to work. If this comes up again that there is "unknown" rainfall in Mexico with a tropical cyclone between 1958-2003, leave a message on my talk page and I'll look it up and post it on the HPC TC rainfall site as soon as I can. Thegreatdr 21:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The data is on the website. The total just over 7 inches was from the Yucatan peninsula. Thegreatdr 15:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sweet job as always. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Passed: Good job

[edit]

Article is well written, well referenced, comprehensive, and stable. The images appear to be all in order as well. Good job and congratulations! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 19:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]