Talk:Hurricane Paine (1986)

Hurricane Paine (1986) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Paine (1986)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 19:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article, Hink. Here are a few comments

"Hurricane Paine in 1986 contributed to one of the most significant flooding events in Oklahoma history" no need for 1986
"By that time, Paine had attained peak winds of 100 mph (155 km/h), and it weakened slightly before hitting the Mexican state of Sonora." it should be replaced with but.
Any preparations from Roslyn?

Ill have more later, that is it for now. Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 19:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I thought it'd be good to establish the year as soon as possible. Normally that happens in the first sentence. Do you still think I should remove it? Good call about "and --> but", and no, I couldn't find much of anything in Mexico on Paine. That's where the typical hurricane preparations would've been (evacs, whatnot). Likewise, I couldn't find good preps for inland US. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Here are some more comments.

with winds of 90 mph

metric units?

over an area of 82.9°F

metric units?

The flooding event caused $350 million in damage,

year?

half of which to agriculture

I reckon there is a word missing *what about the adding the Costliest Pacific hurricanes to the article?

wait for renaming the article because we do not have a WP:TROP consensus (I plan to write an article for the other Paine soem day). Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone

That's it for this round. As a recommendation, when this article passes replace it with one. Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 22:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I addressed all of that. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I bolded the stuff you did not do. I am sorry if I confused you. Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there is no specific damage total for Paine, only for the larger rainfall event, so I opted not to include that template. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great job. Ill read it once more to see if there is no more issues. If not, then you have another GA. Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last, but not least

one of two cyclones in the basin that warranted aircraft data

which storm? Newton? Roslyn? Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Gotcha, it was Newton. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:46, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Time to pass. I apologize for not making this GAN one day (homework and writing articles is more important than this). YE ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - No prob, thanks for the review! Hurricanehink (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hurricane Paine (1986). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090416072423/http://climate.ok.gov/newsmedia/releases/Monthly%20Climate%20of%20Oklahoma%20-%20(09)%20September.doc to http://climate.ok.gov/newsmedia/releases/Monthly%20Climate%20of%20Oklahoma%20-%20(09)%20September.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Paine (1986). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]