Talk:Hwange National Park

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Zimbabwe / Protected areas Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Zimbabwe (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by Protected areas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pictures

I am working on expanding this article and will end up moving gallery pics into the main sections. Babakathy (talk) 06:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight to single incident

The obsessive details about the killing of Cecil are FAR out of proportion to its importance to the subject of this article, the national park. It also is full of inappropriate editorializing about living people. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: To be fair, the story has been picked up by every single major newspaper in the world. It is no longer a single incident but symbolic. I would even argue that Cecils story deserves its own page, so the comments about the media coverage are less out of place (than on this page). --Tobias1984 (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

typical WP:RECENTISM and exactly what are these stories saying about the subject of this article, the national park????? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: That is why I said that it would be better to make a separate page for Cecil (lion). The redirect is not a good idea and invites these divergences from the main subject. Also: Calling things "typical WP:RECENTISM" has never helped a discussion. --Tobias1984 (talk) 12:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

if "Calling things 'typical WP:RECENTISM' has never helped a discussion." it is because the people pushing the recentism fail to read, understand and follow the policy. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Funding

It would be nice to see something about how this place gets funded — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.207.135.183 (talk) 13:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Hwange National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]